From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-24 08:01:43
> > I think this is a good addition, but we should probably make the
> > addition for all Win32 compilers since I think this is actually
> > part of the Win32 api.
> I agree with that. Would it be better to make it a millisec_clock, or
> just use the microsec_clock but the resolution is only milliseconds?
Hmm, I'm thinking that for consistency it would probably be better to
call it millisec_clock.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk