From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-27 07:16:23
Johan Nilsson wrote:
> I might be a bit off here (coming in late into the discussion), but I'd
> prefer consistency in my code; using microsec_clock for both Windows and
> Unix code - even if the real 'resolution' is dependent of the system time
> updates on the Win platforms.
That is an option, but if a millisecond clock is introduced, it like to
see it implemented on all platforms, then you could use that on all
platforms rather than microsec_clock which isn't 'really' supported
under windows. At least this way you are dealing with a known resolution.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk