From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-15 18:00:27
Hubert Holin <Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden]> writes:
| * overload versus template-based is NOT OK.
| I strongly believe that the
| benefits of genericity outweight, in this case, compatibility with C; if
And the C-compatibility argument is bogus anyway: If that proposal is
ever adopted in C, the functions won't have the same name since C has
no concept of overload, and will add suffix or prefix.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk