[boost] Re: dumb_ptr<>

From: James Curran (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-16 09:26:24

Thomas Witt wrote:
> Sorry for being so dumb, but the intent isn't clear to me. What kind
> of ownership semantics should dumb_ptr imply?

    I believe he's looking for something along the lines up  (modulo this
particular syntax no being allowed yet)

    template <typename C>
        typedef    C*    dumb_ptr;

--
Truth,
James Curran
www.noveltheory.com (personal)
www.njtheater.com (professional)