From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-16 10:57:05
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:03:49 +0100, "John Maddock"
>> Just in case it wasn't clear, I was waiting for a response :-)
>Sorry, been off line, IMO go ahead.
No problem :-) I just was under the impression you considered the
>Agreed, however it's easier for the config system to have a single macro
>that gets set if some test fails (by the configure script if necessary),
>which then goes on to determine the state of the helper macros depending on
>whether it's set or not.
Yes, I see.
>> Unfortunately, these are 4 macros, and I already seem to hear you...
>> Thus, let's just pretend I never said it! :-)
>There's no doubt that it is clearer that way, so since these don't need test
>cases (we already have it), just go ahead and add them if you want to
Thanks. I'll do it in the morning, after some quick tests.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk