[boost] Re: [type_traits] Missing include for function traits?

From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-17 10:32:35

John Maddock wrote:
> Yes, I made it gcc specific, also added a similar fix for is_union, but not
> for has_trivial_copy which also produces these warnings.  Fixes will be in
> cvs towards the weekend - when I get my cvs access up again (I only have
> limited mail access at present).

Looks good. That means, I think it will do the job - not that I like the 
#ifdef's :)

>>Also, IIRC, the comment from Dave seen below is lying (due to changes
>>that happened after he wrote it). Maybe we should fix this up, too. It
>>would IMHO lead to the removal of the #ifdef-block, but I didn't wanted
>>to mix it up with the fix for the warnings, so I left it out for now.
> 
> Not quite - the fix is required if you can't pass non-copyable types through
> is_convertible, and that is still true for some compilers unfortunately,
> even if this has been fixed for most of them...

Ah, thanks. And sorry to Dave. Hm, type traits are a good example for 
"never change a running system" I guess... :))

Regards, Daniel

-- 
Daniel Frey
aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology
Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany
fon: [phone], fax: [phone]
eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de