Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-19 23:55:50

Next message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Re: optional<>: size optimization"
Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: optional<>: size optimization"
In reply to: Neal D. Becker: "Re: [boost] Re: [filesystem] new functions proposals"
Next in thread: Edouard Poor: "Re: [boost] Re: [filesystem] new functions proposals"

Neal D. Becker wrote:
> Slightly OT, but can anyone give me a hint what these alternate
> streams are intended for? Is this an attempt to recommit something
> like the apple data/resource fork?

According to the NT Internals books I've read, alternate streams were
implemented in NTFS specifically to support Apple clients on NT-based file
servers.

-cd

Next message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Re: optional<>: size optimization"
Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: optional<>: size optimization"
In reply to: Neal D. Becker: "Re: [boost] Re: [filesystem] new functions proposals"
Next in thread: Edouard Poor: "Re: [boost] Re: [filesystem] new functions proposals"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk