[boost] Re: optional<>: size optimization

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-20 23:50:16

"Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:b7v4u4$8vn$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> [...]
> I think I like this enhanced version.
> 'max_size_type_that_fit_in_padding'
> must better be one of the intergral types
> to make easy and safe to use, so I guess that
> there might ocurr that some bits
> are wasted anyway.

Why couldn't it be a char[]?

Dave