From: Hamish Mackenzie (hamish_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-24 12:58:40
On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 16:32, Heath Davis wrote:
> Bravo!!! This is a truly novel approach! I agree that the
> shared_ptr::operator< is meaningless.
No it is very useful. For instance consider
set< shared_ptr< foo > >
A set of pointers to foo objects where no instance of foo is included
more than once.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk