Re: [boost] Re: Sorting list < shared_ptr < foo > > using std::list::sort()

From: Hamish Mackenzie (hamish_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-24 12:58:40

On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 16:32, Heath Davis wrote:
> Bravo!!! This is a truly novel approach!  I agree that the 
> shared_ptr::operator< is meaningless.

No it is very useful. For instance consider

set< shared_ptr< foo > >

A set of pointers to foo objects where no instance of foo is included
more than once.

Hamish