From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-24 13:59:03
> I'm not really interested in this file, but since gcc
> complained about an
> unitialized variable, I did fix it. And it is the first
> patch. So please
> apply it (and change the name of the enum item before, if necessary).
It make sence.
> However, by looking at the code, I found a good example of data
> duplication; and the purpose of the second patch is to clean it a bit.
It's not really code duplication. I would anyway prefer separate mapping
between enum and names.
Also I am going ot change the whole CLA processing scheme somewhere this
release. So I would hold with with change.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk