From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-25 02:21:20
Beman Dawes wrote:
> >Beman, if that's fine with you, I'll code them.
> Yes, go ahead. Although the concept of "extension" may be foreign on some
> operating systems, I think the idea is widespread enough to be worth
> including. If I understand your proposal correctly, the code and its usage
> will be portable when applied to a path build from the generic grammar and
> the results will be more or less correct (if a bit odd) when applied to a
> path which used the system dependent constructor and an operating system
> specific path string.
Yes, I think that's so. I attach a patch against CVS HEAD with implementation,
docs and tests. Could you take a look and tell if anything should be
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk