RE: [boost] Re: in/out parameters, coding styles and maintenanc

From: Justin M. Lewis (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-25 03:33:31

The implementation may be similar, or even identical, I'm not sure.
But, the use is entirely different.  To prevent implicit casting, you'd
need 2 different classes, like there are in the file.  And, like I said,
at one point these classes had checks built in.  They could be put back
in, if that's how people prefer them.  But, to be used properly, they
need to be made in a way that they can't be cast to other similar
objects.  

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:16 AM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: [boost] Re: in/out parameters, coding styles and maintenanc

"Justin M. Lewis" <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:005601c30aff$f5cff250$0300000a_at_noidea...
> Ok
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/in_out/

And again. How is it different from boost::ref?

Gennadiy.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost