Re: [boost] Re: bit_and, bit_or, ... function object

From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-28 02:12:17

On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 01:47 AM, David Abrahams wrote:

> Matthias Troyer <troyer_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Dear Boosters,
>>
>> Since there was no reply to my message of three weeks ago I assume
>> there is no interest in the Boost community and we will keep this in
>> our own libraries.
>>
>> Matthias
>
> I like 'em; I just don't need 'em.  Yet.  Is there a convenient
> existing boost library to slip them into?

I would suggest functional.hpp which already contains other 
improvements/addiction to the standard <functional> header.

Matthias