Re: [boost] Re: fix: intel.hpp

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-28 05:39:23

John Maddock wrote:

>>It is even more complicated than that. I tried 12 different combinations
>>(all Windows) and put results into table (hope
>>formatting stays readable):
> 
> 
> Thanks, that tells us that neither _NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED nor
> _WCHAR_T_DEFINED can be used here, what about the EDG generic macro _WCHAR_T
> ?
> 
> BTW the section:
> 
> #ifndef _CPPUNWIND
> #  define BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
> #endif
> 
> Is not required in intel.hpp as it is already covered by common_edg.hpp.

It interferes with Intel for Linux (BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS get #defined
now). I suggest to revert intel.hpp to version 1.18.

Regards,
m