Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-30 21:25:57

"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> ** and which I'm not sure is even addressing a real-world problem. It
>> might be; I am just not sure.
> It is not something that can't be worked around, but it is a
> nuisance. Basically, you have to expand a macro to produce a
> comma--but do it only at the last possible step so it doesn't go
> through any other macros. The problem is not that so much. Rather,
> it implies that you have to pass everything else as such an
> "invocable" entity--which is annoying at best.

I was talking about the "macro scoping" feature currently under
consideration in the LWG, not Vesa's proposal.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at