Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-30 21:27:44


Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At 08:45 PM 4/30/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>
> >Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >
> >> So please don't take it personally, but I'm not going to apply the
> >> patches unless someone comes forward with more rationale for
> >> supporting reporting tool compilations with VC++ 6.0.
> >
> >One of these days you might want to assign the job of producing
> >regression logs for VC6 to someone who has a real stake in that
> >compiler, so you'll have one less thing to test. They might have a
> >real stake in it among other things because they don't have anything
> >else.
>
> The issue wasn't whether or not to produce regression logs for VC++
> 6.0, but whether the tools to produce the status reports themselves
> should be buildable with 6.0. Right now they compile OK on most modern
> compilers, but not VC++ 6.0.

I understand that.

Suppose you get tired of generating vc6 status and want to hand the
job off to someone that has only a VC6 compiler? How will they
build/maintain the status tools?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk