From: Terje SlettebÃ¸ (tslettebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-02 08:53:24
>From: "Terje SlettebÃ¸" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]>
> >From: "Paul A. Bristow" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> > But is this becoming less important with the release of C++.net 2003 aka
> 7.11?which is rumoured to do nearly all the things it should. So if
> specialisation is the best/convenient solution, I would use it.
> I know. However, the template use is "conservative", as MSVC is not the
> only one with problems, there are some other quite flaky compilers out
> there - Borland C++ comes to mind. However, if there's a feature that
> requires unreasonable workarounds, I'll let it be.
I meant letting the workaround be, not the feature. :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk