From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-03 00:30:18
Justin M. Lewis wrote:
> Sorry, no offense meant, but, to me, the argument that for this to be
> useful it would have to be applied universally to all things
> everywhere, is ridiculous. My statement is not ad hominem; the
> comment is directed at the argument, not the person. It's not even
> strong language. But, sorry to anyone who might have taken offense.
You are taking it out of context. Please re-read my messages again
carefully. What I kept on saying is that you can't *CLAIM* that we'll
all be saved from the "trouble of having to hunt down all kinds of
functions" with your proposed solution. You can only *CLAIM*
that *IFF* you enforce your solution and apply it universally.
Obviously, you can't.
Anyway, I'll leave this discussion now. Good luck!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> "Justin M. Lewis" <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> Again, that's ridiculous.
>> I don't know if you're still trying to convince people that your idea
>> could be useful to them, but if so I'm not sure that's the way to go
>> about it.
-- Joel de Guzman joel at boost-consulting.com http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk