From: Terje Slettebø (tslettebo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-03 22:35:28
>From: "Justin M. Lewis" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> > >From: "Justin M. Lewis" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> > > > > Looking a function signature up becomes a nightmare when there are
> > > > > potentially 100's of them. So, that's hardly a realistic
> > > > I think it is.
> > >
> > > If you think it is, then you've never been in the situation where you
> > > have 1000's of undocumented functions, and you've never had to trace
> > > a function where 10's if not 100's of unfamiliar calls are made. And,
> > > you think it is a realistic solution, then you're really not seeing
> > > problem these classes were meant to address.
> > Yes, I'm seeing it. It's just that there are alternative solutions to
> > this, as has been presented.
> There really aren't reasonable alternative solutions, at least not in my
In your opinion. I think there are reasonable alternatives. If there wasn't,
I'd think everybody would have agreed with you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk