Re: [boost] Re: in/out parameters, codingstylesandmaintenance

From: Gregory Colvin (gregory.colvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-03 23:15:48

On Saturday, May 3, 2003, at 22:03 America/Denver, Noel Yap wrote:

> Gregory Colvin wrote:
>> Anyway, I jumped into this thread mainly to opine that Noel's
>> suggestions
>> were not, so far as I could see, any better than your proposal, not to
>> rehash what we have already discussed.
>
> I think that if ref<> were used instead of dumb_ptr<> in my previous
> posts, it's a little better since, IIRC, ref<> already exists.

A little.  But so far Justin's examples don't require it.