From: Justin M. Lewis (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-04 15:26:57
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel Yap" <Noel.Yap_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: in/out parameters, codingstylesandmaintenance
> Floris van den Berg wrote:
> > I think that c_out is practically the same as c_in_out, only with c_out
> > called function doesn't care about the initial value of the passed
> > parameter.
> Can we agree, then, that there's no need for c_out?
Of course not, because you haven't yet addressed the issue of non-copyable
objects, OR polymorphic types, OR large structs that can't be copyed into a
retrun value, OR a function where you have a lot of return types.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk