From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-08 18:38:59
Beman Dawes wrote:
> > ... various backup suggestions
> SourceForge already makes the entire Boost CVS tarball available every
> night, and several Boosters download it daily.
Oh, good. There is no such thing as too much backup.
> (At least I hope they do - I have no way of telling if they are still
> running their cron jobs.)
> That is supposed to protect us from total failure, such as
> SourceForge going bankrupt and shutting down unexpectedly.
> But it isn't clear what the best procedure is to protect against
> partial failure - it seemed easier just to restore file-by-file in
> this particular case.
Sure, if the files content indeed makes sense.
I would characterize our case as malfunctioning with the possible
result of the bogus content; in this situation, plain content backup,
whether it's intentional or accidental, tarball or separate files, is
not a reliable source to restore from. We just happened to be lucky
this time (if John will be able to restore his branch).
I think Vladimir's suggestion makes sense and is worth doing. It covers
what plain backups cannot, and costs nothing in terms of maintenance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk