From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-19 10:18:48
At 07:45 AM 5/19/2003, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
>The best solution would be to track down compilers that complains if the
>return statement is missing and conditionaly add it for them. But only
>maintainer can tell us for which compiler the dummy return statement was
>needed. Or maybe we could just remove it and see which compilers suddenly
>complains in the regression tests :-).
Doug's on vacation and then in transit to the West Coast, so it may be
awhile before he can respond. So as you have already indicated, please do
be very conservative about any changes you make.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk