Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-23 15:36:55

Next message: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Previous message: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] Regression tests for Linux gcc 2.95.3 [-stlport] and operators.hpp"
In reply to: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Next in thread: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Reply: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"

Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Peter Dimov wrote:
>
>> Can someone verify whether __FUNCTION__ or __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ works
>> on Intel/linux?
>
> On Intel 7.1 for Linux, both __FUNCTION__ and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
> work.

Thanks, 7.1/linux has __ICC == 710, right?

Next message: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Previous message: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] Regression tests for Linux gcc 2.95.3 [-stlport] and operators.hpp"
In reply to: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Next in thread: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"
Reply: Guillaume Melquiond: "Re: [boost] Fix: current_function.hpp"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk