[boost] Re: shared_ptr/weak_ptr and thread-safety

From: Trevor Taylor (xju_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-28 04:09:55

> Are you planning to implement a "real" pthread_refcount_t for, say, Windows
> and Linux/x86?

Who? Me?

No, I no nothing about any of this (as I've just demonstrated), it just 
seemed from your "Maybe one day we'll have a pthread_refcount_t" 
statement that things could be improved if one existed - so I was 
suggesting an alternative way to get the same effect as a 
pthread_refcount_t.

I don't know what atomic<> is but from the name it's probably exactly 
what I was
suggesting.

Trevor

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>