From: Chuck Messenger (chuckm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-29 15:46:48
Schoenborn, Oliver wrote:
>>>- You always have A owns A_impl owns B owns B_impl refs A (what your
>>>original code seems to say), in this case B_impl contains an RRef<A>
>>>instead of a DynObj<A> and everything works
> I'd like to hear whether that's your case or not.
No. A and B are completely symmetrical. They each equally "own" the other.
>>Imagine that I'm supplying a network simulation library. I have:
>>...(network node code deleted for brevity)...
>>The the problem space is essentially circular. There's nothing to be
>>done about it at a design level, in order to make reference
> I don't understand why you keep bringing in reference counting, since NoPtr
> does not use it when it comes to ownership, therefore you're talking about a
> problem that does not exist for NoPtr. The application domain is irrelevant:
> if your problem is with ref counting and NoPtr does not use ref counting,
> then you don't have that problem.
I looked at NoPtr, and quickly determined that it didn't implement
garbage collection, so it couldn't solve my problem. However, I don't
understand what NoPtr *does*.
- Chuck Messenger
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk