From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-01 12:47:54
At 12:09 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Looks much improved, thanks!
>> Two of the config_info macros look a bit questionable:
>I don't know what you mean; I didn't touch the Boost config. All I
>did was to edit intel-win32-tools.jam.
Understood. But now that the toolset is working much better I'd also like
to see if we can fix any other problems, such as config issues.
> Did you follow the link above?
Yes, looks nice. I changed my environment variables as indicated, and they
>> BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP [no value]
>> BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T [no value]
>> Perhaps BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP is needed to be able to use
>> Microsoft library?
>> BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T seems completely wrong. That isn't even set
>> VC++7.0. Or am I missing something? (The command line is below.)
>If config_info is showing wrong answers, I can't help it, though I am
>not at all sure ADL is enabled for this compiler. I didn't change
>much about the command-line options that get used with Intel7 anyway.
>If you want to try to add -Qoption,c,--no-microsoft-bugs when the
>compiler is version 7, you could try to do that, but you'd better
>test it atop each of the vc6, vc7, and vc7.1 standard libs to make
>sure it's actually compatible.
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm not so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ <7.1.
The fresh regression tests are now posted. Here is what changed in the
Intel results, presumably as a result of the intel-win32 changes:
New fails: config/limits_test
New passes: lambda/exception_test
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk