From: Larry Evans (jcampbell3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-02 07:40:24
Reece Dunn wrote:
> Anthony Williams wrote:
>> > Writing an XML parser from scratch for boost should, IMHO, have these
>> > features:
> Writing a lexer/parser is a complex task. It wasn't a requirement, more
> a suggestion/my opinion on what a boost XML library should be like.
> There are four possible options:
>  Use another lexer/parser generator. This is an unknown, and again
> with the Boost distribution.
I'd suggest pccts or antlr:
It can generate c++ code. IIRC, it has good error recovery, which is
something SPIRIT is a bit weak in.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk