From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-04 18:07:33
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
> What is the paper you have in mind to justify the absence of semaphores?
> I would like very much to understand and be convinced. It would also
> be nice if the #10 of the FAQ would point to this paper.
It can be found here:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk