From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-05 11:41:19
"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." wrote:
> I'm baffled that they want to penalize (time and space) those for whom a
> naked semaphore works. It's blatantly clear to anyone who's had to write a
> mutex that it's additional code on TOP of a semaphore.
Optimization stratergies aside (they are different for mutexes and
semas) a binary semaphore can be used as "normal" POSIX mutex.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk