Boost logo

Boost :

From: Hugo Duncan (hugoduncan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-11 16:39:21


Aleksey and all,

mpl::size<Sequence> returns integral_c<long,..> on gcc, vc7.1 but
integral_c<int,..> on bcc564.

Is this intentional?

I am writing specialisations of classes instantiated with the result of
mpl::size. The
above difference in types means that the specialisations have to be
different for bcc.

If this is unavoidable could we have (or does it already exits?) a typedef
for the the
fundamental integer type used in the returned integral type constant?

Hugo


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk