From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-12 09:04:34
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Is there any interest in this library evolving
> into a boost::xml library ? If so, what needs to change,
> what needs to be added / removed ?
I think that there is considerable interest in a boost::xml library. But...
Document *document = Document::parse_file(argv);
... I don't believe that a raw pointer based interface is acceptable.
xml::dom::document document = xml::dom::parse_file(argv);
looks much better. BTW why is basic_document<>::write_file virtual but
The SAX part looks OK to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk