From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-13 14:43:00
David Abrahams wrote:
> > What about re-introducing the boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp file:
> > #define BOOST_ITERATOR_ADAPTOR_VERSION 0x2000
> > #include <boost/iterator/iterator_adaptor.hpp>
> > This would allow for some version tracking and a smooth
> migration path
> > for those libraries, willing to support both, the new _and_ the old
> > iterator libs. Thought's?
> OK, that seems reasonable. Libraries can check to see if
> BOOST_ITERATOR_ADAPTOR_VERSION is defined and use different
> code in that case.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk