From: Maxim Egorushkin (e-maxim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-13 09:15:08
"Jonathan D. Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Yes, this is very elegant. No codecvt's in sight -- just pure adaptors.
> nice treatment of optional template parameters. It puts my design (and
> certain my implementation) to shame. I should have thought more about the
> general idea of composition before responding to posts.
I stole the idea of Named Template Parameters from Boost Iterator Adapters
white papers. :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk