[boost] Re: Re: Re: Some questions on the FSM submission

From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-15 16:08:19

Jeff,

> http://www.rational.com/products/whitepapers/441.jsp?SMSESSION=NO
>
>> From one of the tool vendors:
>> http://www.telelogic.com/products/tau/languages/uml_sdl/background.cfm

Interesting. Thanks for the links.

> 4) I think you are right that your submission can cover most of the
> ground of both.  That said, I for one, think that coverage of UML is
> the more important of the two.

I agree, especially after seeing that the newest version of SDL (2000) has
copied many UML (Harel) state chart concepts.

Regards,

Andreas