From: Paul A Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-19 13:51:31
| Well, you wanted to know what is likely to be accepted. In a
| formal review (this isn't anymore, AFAIU, is it?) I would
| vote no to your approach.
But would you vote yes if the only presentation was Daniel's method?
I am only really concerned that the accurate constants become more
in name and value.
PS I'd like to hear more views on this -
previous review comments were quite different,
being very cautious about an 'advanced' scheme like this.
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk