From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-24 04:59:05
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > There's another question: why store "u" at all. I'm
> > guessing "source(*ei, g)" might be more efficient?
> That's a good thought, but there might be a problem
> trying to dereference a past-the-end iterator. I
> mentioned before that ei_end could always be generated
> from u instead of storing it, but it's just a question
> of trading cycles for bytes. Which resource is more
I don't know. It *seems* that source(*ei, g) should be pretty fast, but only
> > 1. It needs license from you.
> Can you copy the standard license in for me?
> > 3. Maybe, the FAQ, either fully or partically, must
> > be added too.
> How about adding:
> // FAQ's can be found at:
> If you happen to know that one of those links can be
> counted on to persist, then the other three aren't
> really needed.
I think the first link is reliable.
Your patch is now comitted to CVS. Thanks!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk