From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-26 01:46:21
> Nothing is legally bullet-proof. People should not have illusions
> about that.
I know, law is not an "exact science" and all that. What I meant is that
boosters should stand a *very low* chance of ever having legal problems as a
result of their (maybe flawed) work on the boost distribution. And there
should be an equally low chance of someone legally rereleasing boost work
under his name without mentioning the original authtors.