[boost] Re: compose_f_gxy_hxy

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-26 08:21:13

Daniel Frey wrote:
> 
> Sure. But still compose.hpp is in itself incomplete. And it completes 
> the standard's parts on function objects so I think it might be 
> desirable to supply compose_f_gxy_hxy. If we take bind into account 
> here, we could just as well remove compose.hpp completly, couldn't we? 
> Or was this your suggestion?
> 

I thought bind was the preferred method over compose now.  This lead me 
to believe that compose was left in for backwards compatibility.  I 
haven't actually used compose, so don't know if there are things it can 
do that bind doesn't, mind you.

Thanks

Russell