Boost logo

Boost :

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-26 08:21:13

Daniel Frey wrote:
> Sure. But still compose.hpp is in itself incomplete. And it completes
> the standard's parts on function objects so I think it might be
> desirable to supply compose_f_gxy_hxy. If we take bind into account
> here, we could just as well remove compose.hpp completly, couldn't we?
> Or was this your suggestion?

I thought bind was the preferred method over compose now. This lead me
to believe that compose was left in for backwards compatibility. I
haven't actually used compose, so don't know if there are things it can
do that bind doesn't, mind you.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at