From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-26 08:21:13
Daniel Frey wrote:
> Sure. But still compose.hpp is in itself incomplete. And it completes
> the standard's parts on function objects so I think it might be
> desirable to supply compose_f_gxy_hxy. If we take bind into account
> here, we could just as well remove compose.hpp completly, couldn't we?
> Or was this your suggestion?
I thought bind was the preferred method over compose now. This lead me
to believe that compose was left in for backwards compatibility. I
haven't actually used compose, so don't know if there are things it can
do that bind doesn't, mind you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk