|
|
Boost : |
From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-26 10:20:33
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>
>>Peter Dimov wrote:
>>
>>>You've considered
>>>
>>>bind(f, bind(g, _1, _2), bind(h, _1, _2))
>>>
>>>right? ;-)
>>
>>Sure. But still compose.hpp is in itself incomplete. And it completes
>>the standard's parts on function objects so I think it might be
>>desirable to supply compose_f_gxy_hxy.
>
> The standard is moving towards 'bind' -
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2003/n1455.htm.
>
>>If we take bind into account here, we could just as well remove
>>compose.hpp completly, couldn't we?
>
> We might, in a couple of years. Seriously, 'bind' is superior here; it
> takes some learning to switch over from the 'compose_*' family, but it's
> worth it.
Well, I'm already using the lambda-library, so I'm no longer bound to
compose_*. I just thought that completing compose.hpp might be a good
idea. But if it's deprecated, this doesn't really make sense. Never
mind... :)
Regards, Daniel
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk