From: Bohdan (gejrlaug_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-26 18:27:12
"Stefan Seefeld" <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Hi Bohdan,
> even though you may think of a dom tree as 'just another tree', there is
> really quite a bit of domain-specific semantics associated with it
> that makes it impractical to use a general-purpose tree/graph library
> as the underlying representation.
I didn't mean that dom::document==tree_container or even uses it, but
dom::document has tree_container-like interface plus some
additional domain-specific possibilities.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk