Re: [boost] why no strict ownership smart pointer in boost

From: Gregory Colvin (gregory.colvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-01 18:48:05

On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 17:36 America/Denver, Schoenborn, Oliver 
wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 14:38 America/Denver, Boost wrote:
>>
>>> I did a search in the archives and found nothing on this:
>>>
>>> Why is there no strict-ownership smart-pointer in boost?
>> Just curious
>>> to
>>> know what the reasons are. Thanks,
>>
>> What do want beyond what boost::scoped_ptr and std::auto_ptr provide?
>
> Ability to be used in STL containers, and explicit transfer of 
> ownership
> capabilities (e.g. *no* move-on-copy etc).

So what would the copy semantics be?