Re: [boost] Re: filtered/decorated streambufs

From: Larry Evans (jcampbell3_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-02 08:51:15

Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> | [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Larry Evans

[snip]

> I can see much logic in your layout (much more perhaps than in the C language!)
> but sadly, I think the balance of pros and cons is in favour of sticking to a
> consistent style for a library like Boost code guidelines.

I'm trying to get synopsis to translate into Boost guideline form; 
however, I'm having trouble with getting comments properly attached
to the declarations.  As soon as that is done, I'll upload it.
Meanwhile, I've emailed turkanis_at_[hidden] a copy of
the latest version where:

> The main change is that the ostreambuf_decorator_end,
> which replaces the ostreambuf_decorator_con, only serves to
> terminate the pipeline.  I thought this was better than having the
> terminator do two things at once.  Also, the code is simpler.