Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52:52


At 05:54 PM 7/7/2003, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
>> A half-way solution is to have something like:
>>
>> BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_NUMBERS(x,y,IsEqual)
>>
>> and let users specify their own Preciates.
>
>There is BOOST_CHECK_PREDICATE
>
>> By default, the Test library could provide
>> a straight-forward ABSOLUTE-ERROR comparator:
>
>By default, the Test library provides relative error comparator, which is
>according to my understanding is more correct.

Could you please be more specific about which Boost.Test features you think
should remain and which should be removed or modified? I'm having trouble
relating the discussion to the actual Boost.Test public interface.

Thanks,

--Beman


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk