[boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

From: Daryle Walker (dwalker07_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-10 01:41:24

On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 12:25 AM, Joaquín Muñoz wrote:

[SNIP]
> A related question: Should boost::multiindex::multiindex_set be raised 
> into Boost namespace as boost::multiindex_set (or whatever its final 
> name)? Seems the standard practice, but I think it is safer to ask 
> first.
[TRUNCATE]

If the library will be insanely huge, like Regex, Graph, or Spirit, 
then it could go in its own namespace.

If libraries of a similar domain are likely to be made (or have already 
been made), then all of those libraries could share a namespace (like 
Math, Numeric, I/O).

If both of these conditions exist, then you could create your namespace 
within the domain namespace.

Else, the library is fairly small and unique, so it could go in the top 
Boost namespace.

(Didn't someone propose a "container" namespace?  Maybe this class 
template can go there.)

Daryle