Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-15 03:58:10

Next message: Gennadiy Rozental: "[boost] Re: How to achieve this goal using boost::tokenizer?"
Previous message: Russell Hind: "[boost] Re: How to achieve this goal using boost::tokenizer?"
Next in thread: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: Intel 7.1 bug report for boost::checked_delete?"
Reply: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: Intel 7.1 bug report for boost::checked_delete?"

I've seen from the regression tests that the Intel compiler (7.1) seems
to have a problem with checked_delete. I looked into it and found out
what triggers the bug. Has anyone else done something similar and
reported the bug to Intel or should I do it?

Also, it seems possible to create a work-around for boost. I'll post a
patch for discussion soon :)

Regards, Daniel

-- 
Daniel Frey
aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology
Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany
fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99
eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de

Next message: Gennadiy Rozental: "[boost] Re: How to achieve this goal using boost::tokenizer?"
Previous message: Russell Hind: "[boost] Re: How to achieve this goal using boost::tokenizer?"
Next in thread: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: Intel 7.1 bug report for boost::checked_delete?"
Reply: Daniel Frey: "[boost] Re: Intel 7.1 bug report for boost::checked_delete?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk