From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-15 19:32:24
Daniel Frey <d.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:26:43 +0200, David Abrahams wrote:
>> What does everybody think about doing a 1.30.1 release "RSN?"
> I think it's too late, let's go for a 1.31.0. I think that we'll hear
> about problems with the 1.31.0 really soon after release and probably a
> 1.31.1 can follow shortly after. For 1.30.0, we IMHO missed the
> opportunity do to a 1.30.1 without lots of pain/work. As Beman already
> said there is too much in CVS to "backport" it to a 1.30.1. The question
> is, whether we learn from it for a 1.31.1 :)
I wouldn't dream of backporting everything we've done since 1.30.0.
That would be pointless. There are just a few errors which prevent
major portions of 1.30.0 from compiling. I backported all the
important post-1.30.0 fixes immediately after hearing about them, but
I'm not sure everyone else did.
Note that 1.31.0 is going to be a code-breaking release for anyone
who uses iterator adaptors, so it might be important for them to get
a working 1.30.1.
But anyway, I don't care that much. A .1 release is more work, and
I'm all for avoiding work.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk