Boost logo

Boost :

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-18 12:28:50

Jon Biggar wrote:
> The assert in the smart_ptr case is a different, since asserting rather
> than dereferencing a null pointer is merely moving the inevitable
> SEGV/core dump up a bit to a place where it's probably a bit easier to
> debug.

Ok, but what happens if locking an already locked mutex where undefined
behaviour? This isn't this the same as the smart_ptr case? Who knows
how the actual implementation is on all the platforms, or future platforms?



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at