Re: [boost] current_function.hpp extension

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-20 18:37:17

At Sunday 2003-07-20 04:29, you wrote:
>Hi Peter,
> >
> > If a compiler has a current function facility but is not currently
>supported
> > by current_function.hpp, if you show '(unknown)' users of this compiler
>will
> > spot the problem and submit a patch, or at least report it to us.
> >
> > If not, they may not even realize that the library could have given them
>the
> > name of the current function.
> >
> > Let me know if you remain unconvinced. :-)
> >
>
>Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-)
>This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility.
>VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it?

don't do anything.  VC6 has been replaced.  If you want to support every 
compiler back to CFront, you're not going to get a lot done.

>As a sidenote, I will give full details about SMART_ASSERT_CONTEXT in the
>documentation of SMART_ASSERT - sorry it hasn't been done yet :-(
>
>Best,
>John
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"