From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-20 18:37:17
At Sunday 2003-07-20 04:29, you wrote:
> > If a compiler has a current function facility but is not currently
> > by current_function.hpp, if you show '(unknown)' users of this compiler
> > spot the problem and submit a patch, or at least report it to us.
> > If not, they may not even realize that the library could have given them
> > name of the current function.
> > Let me know if you remain unconvinced. :-)
>Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-)
>This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility.
>VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it?
don't do anything. VC6 has been replaced. If you want to support every
compiler back to CFront, you're not going to get a lot done.
>As a sidenote, I will give full details about SMART_ASSERT_CONTEXT in the
>documentation of SMART_ASSERT - sorry it hasn't been done yet :-(
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk