|
Boost : |
From: Daniel Spangenberg (dsp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-21 04:29:03
John Torjo schrieb:
> Exactly! Don't do anything! But in order not to do anything, I need to know
> whether the compiler support a FUNCTION-like macro or not.
>
> Otherwise, I won't know (and assume it has), and print to the user something
> like:
>
> function= '(unknown)'.
>
> Which would you prefer?
I although think, that some additional detection macro, a la
BOOST_HAS_NO_CURRENT_FUNCTION_AVAILABLE
would be useful and consistent to other deficiency flags already existing
in the Boost library.
Just my personal 0.02 EURO
Daniel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk